Wes, can you take a look at this and tell me if there's a more "optimal" way to do it? The original code in Kelsey-TOB beta results in No Valid Links if Edwin isn't around. Here's my workaround, but if there's a more efficient way to go, please let me know.
Idea is that Kelsey always interjects, and if Eddie is there, he responds to Kelsey's interject, then we continue on.
INTERJECT_COPY_TRANS BAZMONK 11 FWkintbazmonk
== J#KLS25J IF ~IsValidForPartyDialog("J#Kelsey") IsValidForPartyDialog("Edwin")~ THEN @92
== EDWIN25J IF ~IsValidForPartyDialog("J#Kelsey") IsValidForPartyDialog("Edwin")~ THEN @93
END
INTERJECT_COPY_TRANS BAZMONK 11 FWkintbazmonk
== J#KLS25J IF ~IsValidForPartyDialog("J#Kelsey") !IsValidForPartyDialog("Edwin")~ THEN @92
END
Optimal I_C_T coding?
Started by
-jcompton-
, Aug 11 2002 07:57 AM
5 replies to this topic
#2
weimer
-
- Member
- 1569 posts
Posted 11 August 2002 - 09:39 AM
This should work:
INTERJECT_COPY_TRANS BAZMONK 11 FWkintbazmonk
== J#KLS25J IF ~IsValidForPartyDialog("J#Kelsey")~ THEN @92
== EDWIN25J IF ~IsValidForPartyDialog("J#Kelsey") IsValidForPartyDialog("Edwin")~ THEN @93
END
Of course, sometimes my own grasp of the semantics is fuzzy, but if you look in j#kls25j, the state where he says 92 should have 1+X branches: one where Edwin is also present, and the rest are copy_trans of bazmonk 11.
Let me know if that doesn't happen.
INTERJECT_COPY_TRANS BAZMONK 11 FWkintbazmonk
== J#KLS25J IF ~IsValidForPartyDialog("J#Kelsey")~ THEN @92
== EDWIN25J IF ~IsValidForPartyDialog("J#Kelsey") IsValidForPartyDialog("Edwin")~ THEN @93
END
Of course, sometimes my own grasp of the semantics is fuzzy, but if you look in j#kls25j, the state where he says 92 should have 1+X branches: one where Edwin is also present, and the rest are copy_trans of bazmonk 11.
Let me know if that doesn't happen.
#3
-jcompton-
-jcompton-
-
- Guest
Posted 11 August 2002 - 09:55 AM
Nope. That is in fact the code that I originally wrote.This should work:
INTERJECT_COPY_TRANS BAZMONK 11 FWkintbazmonk
== J#KLS25J IF ~IsValidForPartyDialog("J#Kelsey")~ THEN @92
== EDWIN25J IF ~IsValidForPartyDialog("J#Kelsey") IsValidForPartyDialog("Edwin")~ THEN @93
END
Of course, sometimes my own grasp of the semantics is fuzzy, but if you look in j#kls25j, the state where he says 92 should have 1+X branches: one where Edwin is also present, and the rest are copy_trans of bazmonk 11.
Let me know if that doesn't happen.
It generates only this:
IF ~~ THEN BEGIN 112 // from:
SAY #78673 /* ~If Balthazar needed something like that, I don't think it's something I would be able to power through with my magic... it would be too specialized.~ */
IF ~IsValidForPartyDialog("J#Kelsey")
IsValidForPartyDialog("Edwin")~ THEN EXTERN ~EDWIN25J~ 14
END
So it would seem that the COPY_TRANSing is only happening at the end of the I_C_T. That wasn't your intention?
#4
weimer
-
- Member
- 1569 posts
Posted 11 August 2002 - 11:12 AM
That's a bug. Next version (soon) will have the copy_trans bits in all of the states (but above any remaining interjection possibilities).
#5
weimer
-
- Member
- 1569 posts
Posted 11 August 2002 - 11:16 AM
New verison up. Can you verify that it works? And still works in old cases?
#6
-jcompton-
-jcompton-
-
- Guest
Posted 11 August 2002 - 11:24 AM
I'll write something else up for it since my current Kelsey-TOB code is sort of a mess of the old and the new stuff. What do you want to know, exactly, when you say "still works in the old cases"?
