Jump to content


SCSII + RR, conflicting information about installation order


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 -Guest-

-Guest-
  • Guest

Posted 14 September 2012 - 02:37 PM

While going through the readme files I noticed some inconsistent information. The compatibility guide states that SCSII should go after RR, but SCS' readme suggests the opposite. Which one should be followed?

On a sidenote: As for the free action tweak, does it matter when it is installed together with SCSII and RR?

#2 Jarno Mikkola

Jarno Mikkola

    The Imp in his pink raincoat.

  • Member
  • 10911 posts

Posted 14 September 2012 - 03:34 PM

While going through the readme files I noticed some inconsistent information. The compatibility guide states that SCSII should go after RR, but SCS' readme suggests the opposite. Which one should be followed?

Well, in both cases you can choose the one person you listen to... know that the AI listens more of the later the mod is installed. So it's a preference question...

Deactivated account. The user today is known as The Imp.


#3 Dakk

Dakk
  • Member
  • 398 posts

Posted 14 September 2012 - 03:43 PM

While going through the readme files I noticed some inconsistent information. The compatibility guide states that SCSII should go after RR, but SCS' readme suggests the opposite. Which one should be followed?

I don't see the inconsistency? SCS + RR + SCSII? Or do you mean that both SCSII and RR readme wants to be last (every mod wants to be last, for that matter :D )?

#4 -Guest-

-Guest-
  • Guest

Posted 14 September 2012 - 05:45 PM


While going through the readme files I noticed some inconsistent information. The compatibility guide states that SCSII should go after RR, but SCS' readme suggests the opposite. Which one should be followed?

I don't see the inconsistency? SCS + RR + SCSII? Or do you mean that both SCSII and RR readme wants to be last (every mod wants to be last, for that matter :D )?

I was referring to SCSII and RR and in this case you could say that both want to be first ^^
SCSII readme says that it should be installed before RR while RR's compatibility guide demands SCSII to follow after RR.

Ah well, I guess, Jarno has a point here.

#5 Wisp

Wisp
  • Modder
  • 1353 posts

Posted 15 September 2012 - 03:49 AM

I would think installing RR before SCSII (and at this point, probably SCS as well), is the wiser course of action. Most of the content in RR is not of the type to conflict with SCS/SCSII, but there may be some general modifications made by the latter mods that affect the odd aspect of RR (conversely, RR does not have any general modifications that would be terribly relevant for SCS/SCSII).