SCSII + RR, conflicting information about installation order
#1 -Guest-
Posted 14 September 2012 - 02:37 PM
On a sidenote: As for the free action tweak, does it matter when it is installed together with SCSII and RR?
#2
Posted 14 September 2012 - 03:34 PM
Well, in both cases you can choose the one person you listen to... know that the AI listens more of the later the mod is installed. So it's a preference question...While going through the readme files I noticed some inconsistent information. The compatibility guide states that SCSII should go after RR, but SCS' readme suggests the opposite. Which one should be followed?
Deactivated account. The user today is known as The Imp.
#3
Posted 14 September 2012 - 03:43 PM
I don't see the inconsistency? SCS + RR + SCSII? Or do you mean that both SCSII and RR readme wants to be last (every mod wants to be last, for that matter )?While going through the readme files I noticed some inconsistent information. The compatibility guide states that SCSII should go after RR, but SCS' readme suggests the opposite. Which one should be followed?
#4 -Guest-
Posted 14 September 2012 - 05:45 PM
I was referring to SCSII and RR and in this case you could say that both want to be first ^^I don't see the inconsistency? SCS + RR + SCSII? Or do you mean that both SCSII and RR readme wants to be last (every mod wants to be last, for that matter )?
While going through the readme files I noticed some inconsistent information. The compatibility guide states that SCSII should go after RR, but SCS' readme suggests the opposite. Which one should be followed?
SCSII readme says that it should be installed before RR while RR's compatibility guide demands SCSII to follow after RR.
Ah well, I guess, Jarno has a point here.
#5
Posted 15 September 2012 - 03:49 AM