
Iyachtu Xvim
#1
Posted 10 January 2005 - 02:47 AM

#2
Posted 10 January 2005 - 04:48 AM
The developers were only human.

What was the exact context?
Edited by discharger12, 10 January 2005 - 04:49 AM.
No. No, they really are defunct.
#3
Posted 10 January 2005 - 08:21 AM

EDIT: oh and the Time of Troubles was 1357. 1368 is when BG1 took place

Edited by NiGHTMARE, 10 January 2005 - 08:22 AM.
#4
Posted 10 January 2005 - 08:23 AM
Uh no, Iyachtu Xvim has been a god for centuries, if not millenia
. He was somehow imprisoned below Zhential keep (not sure when), but freed during the Time of Troubles.
EDIT: oh and the Time of Troubles was 1357. 1368 is when BG1 took place.
If you do a google search for timeline of westgate you should be able to pick up a bit of Xvim's backstory..
#5
Posted 10 January 2005 - 08:43 AM

I also found one source which says Xvim was born 600 years prior to Bane's death, but I'm not sure of this source's accuracy.
#6
Posted 10 January 2005 - 12:20 PM
Bane and Xvim both rock.
< jcompton > Suggested plugs include "Click here so Compton doesn't ban me. http://www.pocketplane.net/ub"
#7
Posted 11 January 2005 - 02:37 AM
Uh no, Iyachtu Xvim has been a god for centuries, if not millenia
. He was somehow imprisoned below Zhential keep (not sure when), but freed during the Time of Troubles.
EDIT: oh and the Time of Troubles was 1357. 1368 is when BG1 took place.
HEH ?

And : "Year 710 : A gate to the Abyss opens above the palace of Westgate, and a large host of tiefling warriors flee through it, hotly pursued by a small company of tanar'ri. Much of the royal palace is destroyed in the resulting conflagration, and King Thartryn Ilistar I perishes under mysterious circumstances during the blaze. Although eventually the fiends are banished back to the Abyss and the gate closed, the bulk of the tiefling army survives the battle, in far better shape than the city's own forces. Within a fortnight, the leader of the tieflings, Iyachtu Xvim, seizes the throne of Westgate and the surviving scions of the royal house of Ilistar are driven into exile. Once the throne is his, the Fiend King imposes his draconian rule over the entire city, a reign of tyranny in keeping with his claim to be the Son of Bane."
Those quotations are from the FR timeline. They seem to point out that, at the beginning, Xvim was not a god, only a very powerful creature. Could you confirm/infirm them, Nightmare ?
#8
Posted 12 January 2005 - 04:12 PM
< jcompton > Suggested plugs include "Click here so Compton doesn't ban me. http://www.pocketplane.net/ub"
#9
-Aristothenes-
Posted 13 January 2005 - 03:21 AM