And that is why I would like to see more objective reviews of mods, one that gives general information, pros, and cons, preferably in a standard format, with open discussion to follow. It is difficult to be completely objective about something that is, by definition, subjective, but I think a quality review would be another weapon in the arsenal of Sue elimination. Point the modder or player in the right direction and let him decide for himself.
If Jo Rowling(whose books I enjoy greatly, and whose opinion I rather value) says that Cunningham is a great writer and/or Greenwood's Elminster first novel is an admirable example of characterization and overcoming realistic obstacles, I don't think I'll change my opinion all of a sudden - I'll still think that "Elves of Evermeet" is worse than Athans' official BG series.
So, I don't think that brainwashing of players with a few well-placed threads of rave reviews is really going to sway opinions, either.
Was it really necessary to dig up this topic again...?
Yes, it's so much more horrible than paladins with lightsabers.
Again, I do not think that Mary Sue is a bad thing in itself, if the execution is entertaining. Imoen is loved by many BG players; I read Max Frei's books deep into the night, and I do adore the guy; countless other examples, including the generic BG protagonist, who is loved by all eligible ladies and is doomed to win every fight.
But "My character is not a Mary Sue, because I (or those very respectable people) said so!" only raises awareness to the fact, I'm afraid.