Schatten
Member Since 04 May 2003Offline Last Active Feb 06 2005 01:59 PM
Community Stats
- Group Member
- Active Posts 1208
- Profile Views 5865
- Member Title tomo the homo
- Age Age Unknown
- Birthday Birthday Unknown
-
Gender
Not Telling
Posts I've Made
In Topic: Insults to the authors
11 December 2004 - 12:41 PM
In Topic: planescape rats??
07 December 2004 - 10:55 AM
In Topic: Sorcerer Changes
30 November 2004 - 04:21 AM
It's nice to follow Pnp for the good things, not for the lame ones.
Also, we don't have an electronic DM that can adjust things when needed!
I thought at first we could discriminate between the number of affected creatures,
but this isn't the case: there are spells that affect the entire party without projectiles, conversely there are spells that affect one single creature using a pro.
The ability isn't needed (sorcs have already TONS of abilities, especially in V2, it would actually create problems with tables like the ones for bards, which have less stuff), and it's just likely to cause bugs and inconsistencies.
All in all, it's a mess, and I see why this opcode was left unused.
My comrades, once again: please start working on things after they've been debated..
this has merits.... if only, i would implement this only for certain spells like stoneskin to save an extra cast after rest but not for things like protection from or so.... dont know...
In Topic: Sorcerer Changes
26 November 2004 - 06:32 AM
as for the different implementable ideas i would choose the first one with 30-40% or something.
- Spellhold Studios
- → Viewing Profile: Posts: Schatten
- Guidelines


Find content
