Unless Bhaal did some extensive mathematical calculations as he planned his wholesale dalliances, I would think that given the differing gestation times of races and species we could be looking a quite a range of ages for the Bhaalspawn. I would give the old boy credit, however, that he probably planned and coordinated the estimated times of birth (and rates of differing species' maturation) to coincide with his end goal of being brought back from the dead.
Well he must have started long?.long before that. remember Abazigal has managed to make Bhaal a granddaddy. And little Draconis is no kid when we meet up with him.
Hi, IronD
Yep, it's the only explanation, and not a far-fetched, either.
As for the timing issues.
I opted to add a few years between the Time of Troubles and the events of Baldur?s Gate. I just couldn?t deal with a main character who was twelve years old.
This is vexing, and the crux of my original post, but for my purposes, adding 'time' between ToT and the game timeline didn't work either. I have worked out what I think is a simple way around it without resorting to the 'Bhaalspawn aging more quickly,' etc. (All things considered, that's a flimsy, and cheesy,
excuse explanation. Duh.. Like no one would notice during the formative years?) So, yeah.. Actually, it's all come together. Plus, Gorion doesn't 'lie' in
BG1, and neither does the Solar in
ToB.
Thanks to all here for opinions and insights -- much appreciated, as always.
MG